Transnational social movements and campaigns, in reacting to the varieties of cross-border domination, have described their activities in the traditional vocabularies of political protest: as opposition, contestation, disobedience, or, in more vigorous conflicts, as dissidence, resistance, insurgency, or rebellion. In contrast, the emergence of the ‘global constitutionalist’ paradigm in international law and politics has seen a renewed interest in the category of constituent power. Transnational initiatives such as DiEM25 and the World Social Forum have begun to frame their activities in a ‘constitutive’ and less in a ‘reactive’ language. The workshop aims to assess and compare the features and the various strengths and weaknesses of the respective languages of critique and constitution.
Limited number of places!
Please register before 30 April: email@example.com